<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Land8 | Matthew Latham | Activity</title>
	<link>https://land8.com/members/matthewlatham/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://land8.com/members/matthewlatham/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Matthew Latham.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 23:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=6.0.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a9d36486292742f4285b1ab206c718f8</guid>
				<title>Matthew Latham replied to the topic Old vs. New in the forum GENERAL DISCUSSION</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/old-vs-new/#post-158624</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:45:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice sentiment expressed here, but I think the reality is quite different, especially in these hard economic times.  Although I agree that it is a good idea to redevelop existing historic centers and take advantage of existing infrastructure, a combination of existing conditions and government regulations make this not feasible&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-47351"><a href="https://land8.com/forums/topic/old-vs-new/#post-158624" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f188d1b43cca3bafb9e1036f394ced90</guid>
				<title>Matthew Latham replied to the topic GIS in landscape architecture in the forum GENERAL DISCUSSION</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/gis-in-landscape-architecture/#post-163108</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:19:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to the same program as Eric, and it was good to have at least an introduction to GIS.  I use it in my practice occasionally.  Two full semester courses seems like overkill.  Too much for basic knowledge, but too little to land a GIS position, which mostly go to geographers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">809dd2378f9a0aeb1ef64e18d73263a9</guid>
				<title>Matthew Latham replied to the topic PORTFOLIO - chronological order? in the forum GENERAL DISCUSSION</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/portfolio-chronological-order/#post-163052</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you do, put your best, most impressive projects first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">081fdd277c9f73d48d8609838d1feeae</guid>
				<title>Matthew Latham replied to the topic LEED AP or LEED AP with Specialty - what is everyone doing? in the forum GENERAL DISCUSSION</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/leed-ap-or-leed-ap-with-specialty-what-is-everyone-doing/#post-163040</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am keeping my legacy LEED AP and not going for a specialty at this time. The continuing education requirements seem rather cumbersome and do not overlap well with my continuing ed requirements for licensure. I have enough time and expense invested in credential maintenance right now, I do not feel like I need more of that at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b533debba9ba78fbcf886d27d885326</guid>
				<title>Matthew Latham replied to the topic burial at sea.. in the forum GENERAL DISCUSSION</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/burial-at-sea/page/4/#post-163182</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:51:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The burial at sea was absolutely the right thing to do. I thought it was so smart. The reason for doing so is because wherever Bin Laden would have been buried would have become a shrine and rallying point for other terrorists. Having him buried at sea makes it a little harder to have commemorative gatherings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>