<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Land8 | Michael Bliss | Activity</title>
	<link>https://land8.com/members/michaelbliss/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://land8.com/members/michaelbliss/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Michael Bliss.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=6.0.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fd9b3c4643999786c1f9e0a666e1b9ed</guid>
				<title>Michael Bliss replied to the topic Cal Licensure...Liability in the forum PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE</title>
				<link>http://land8.com/forums/topic/cal-licensure-liability/#post-158590</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 07:46:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Rodney, Chris, Wyatt for the informative feedback&#8230;.really helpful.  Without having spent a lot of time with the California Practice Act, I agree with Wyatt that a landscape architect does not have to be a principal to practice at a firm.  I know many licensed LA&#8217;s that are not currently owners of the firms they&#8217;re employed by.  &hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-31052"><a href="http://land8.com/forums/topic/cal-licensure-liability/#post-158590" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>