<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Land8 | Shimi Dahan | Activity</title>
	<link>https://land8.com/members/shimidahan/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://land8.com/members/shimidahan/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Shimi Dahan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=6.0.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6425016d75cc9ddaf8fbdfd92c652f10</guid>
				<title>Shimi Dahan posted an update in the group Digital assets and resources: Whilst I am glad you all find the discussion useful - let's [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/activity/p/20330/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:19:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I am glad you all find the discussion useful &#8211; let&#8217;s avoid blank statements and overlooking the progress some applications had achieved. Every release of each application brings many new and sometimes very good features. Some of these upgrades make a huge difference and change the appeal of the software.<br />
So for 2D – AutoCAD LT is g&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-20330"><a href="https://land8.com/activity/p/20330/" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4d90baa31076ed3e37401c1be7df9144</guid>
				<title>Shimi Dahan posted an update in the group Digital assets and resources: I still have not found an intuitive terrain modelling [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/activity/p/20335/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:33:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have not found an intuitive terrain modelling platform for us landscape architects.<br />
Rhino can produce nice surfaces, which can be pulled and pushed to get the aethetics right, but its contours are inaccurate and, unlike Civil 3D, very static. Civil 3D on the other hand is very dynamic and great in live sections and contours, but falls&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-20335"><a href="https://land8.com/activity/p/20335/" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">baf9bc49f194e1d13730cfbec0de0341</guid>
				<title>Shimi Dahan posted an update in the group Digital assets and resources: John - this question keeps popping up and is a testament of [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/activity/p/20339/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:56:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; this question keeps popping up and is a testament of the range of aspirations, skill sets and experiences out there in the industry.<br />
I have seen them all and to date, I have not seen THE tool for landscape architects. We have to use various platforms to deliver the wide range of services we provide.</p>
<p>There are quite a few parameters to this&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-20339"><a href="https://land8.com/activity/p/20339/" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>