<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Land8 | Steve Jinks | Activity</title>
	<link>https://land8.com/members/stevejinks/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://land8.com/members/stevejinks/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Steve Jinks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=6.0.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">244501ef282835e5b447ebb99b54e83e</guid>
				<title>Steve Jinks replied to the topic Recommendations for Photoshop Rendering File Sizes? in the forum TECHNOLOGY</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/recommendations-for-photoshop-rendering-file-sizes/#post-152868</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in 30&#215;42 in Photoshop as well and keep the res to 200 for optimum print quality and file &#8216;manageability. But you could easily lower the resolution to around 150 to reduce file size.<br />
In terms of performance, if you can, upgrade your RAM to at least 32mb (preferably more), I would make that the first choice to boost some of the PCs ability to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-48897"><a href="https://land8.com/forums/topic/recommendations-for-photoshop-rendering-file-sizes/#post-152868" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>