<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Land8 | Sundog | Activity</title>
	<link>https://land8.com/members/sundog/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://land8.com/members/sundog/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Sundog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=6.0.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c81e09224a09f07e6da60a1983b8e7d7</guid>
				<title>Sundog replied to the topic Is SolidWorks the best 3D CAD software out there today? in the forum TECHNOLOGY</title>
				<link>https://land8.com/forums/topic/is-solidworks-the-best-3d-cad-software-out-there-today/#post-170684</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just some more info for you. The AutoDESK equivalent to SolidWorks is Inventor. They&#8217;re both &#8220;Solid Modeling&#8221; software, in the sense, as you noted, that they model the mass properties of what you&#8217;re making. Unlike 3D programs, which are just three dimensional representations of objects. Also, based on your original post, you should note that the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-35664"><a href="https://land8.com/forums/topic/is-solidworks-the-best-3d-cad-software-out-there-today/#post-170684" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>