Landscape Architecture for Landscape Architects › Forums › GENERAL DISCUSSION › prevention of horizontal soil water movements, esp. in tree pits
- This topic has 1 reply, 5 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by Brett T. Long.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 30, 2011 at 9:06 am #159544Ernst GlaeserParticipant
Hi all of you,
Maybe one of you has a better idea and/or can support by giving further details.
This is my base text to raise a TQ with our Client.
This will (might) be for future use
Regarding capillarity breaker to prevent capillary movement of saline soil water to penetrate into planting medium.
In general specifications, detailed drawings and BoQs consider a capillarity breaker by spreading an adequate layer of coarse gravel covered by one layer of geotextile. This method is sufficient in horizontal and even moderately sloped areas but it does not prevent penetration of saline soil water from verticals i.e. tree pits, deeper planting beds, and the like.
A feasible solution in breaking the capillarity and at the same time allowing sufficient drainage effect is by installing a composite of geotextile/drainage net/geotextile. This material is usually sturdy and stiff enough to allow a usage in the vertical. At the same time flexible enough to follow undulations in the landscape sub grading.
This sort of material is light weight, durable, easy to transport and store, and can be cut to fit, an ideal substitute to tedious drainage gravel transportation and spreading as well as insufficient geotextile overlapping due to heavy winds or consequent material installation.
Thanks
Ernst
November 1, 2011 at 3:04 am #159559Brett T. LongParticipantHi Ernst,
There are several manufacturers of drain mats that are used as underlayment in synthetic fields. These systems completely block water from infiltrating where the soils are expansive as well as providing a structural layer. I prefer Turfcore. A woven Mirafi 500x liner may also be an option although some water will get through very slowly. You could also combine the two for a possible solution.
November 1, 2011 at 4:48 am #159558Ernst GlaeserParticipantHi folks, thanks to the reply so far. I believe that I was not clear enough in my approach.
It is supposed to stop HORIZONTAL soil water movement. It is not about drainage. It should not seal completely to allow soil gas exchange. We have a high sodicity and sea salt content in the surrounding soils. I want to prevent the salt saturated soil water to move back into the planting medium by capillary movement.
Thanks, Ernst
November 2, 2011 at 4:05 am #159557Ernst GlaeserParticipantGood morning Henry,
Yes, I did. The product you, as well as Brett, have proposed is a ground drainage matting and/or soil sealant. Both products are either permeable in both directions or not at all.
The idea is to keep the soil gas exchange and block capillary back flow of soil water, and that only on the sides, ground drain is no issue here.
Thanks
November 3, 2011 at 1:19 am #159556Brett T. LongParticipantThese are also used in horizontal applications.
November 3, 2011 at 2:15 am #159555Andrew Garulay, RLAParticipantCorrect me if I am wrong, but any larger porous material will separate capillary movement from a smaller pored material, such as those suggested above, would work without having to be water proof unless the soil reaches a saturated condition. A small pore space will not give up water to a larger pored material. Capillary movement will end right there.
November 3, 2011 at 5:39 am #159554Ernst GlaeserParticipantOn horizontal the Client wants to have a 20 cm layer of coarse gravel with ordinary geotextile as soil seperator, that is OK, but no good and easy solution for the sides to install.
November 3, 2011 at 5:40 am #159553Ernst GlaeserParticipantWhat’s the point?
November 9, 2011 at 9:02 am #159552Ernst GlaeserParticipantHallo friends,
It’s not all about right or wrong. It is about brain sharing and not having to re-invent the wheel again and again.
I did not give up in trying to find a solution and/or product already invented. Please have a look:
http://www.terram.com/downloads/
Enjoy your day,
Ernst
November 9, 2011 at 12:15 pm #159551Andrew Garulay, RLAParticipantThere is a lot on that web site. Is there a case study or product that matches what you are looking for? I’m interested in your solution.
November 10, 2011 at 9:48 pm #159550Matthew LathamParticipantHere’s an idea. Surround the tree pit with a six-inch thickness of open graded gravel (ASTM D448 #57) wrapped in filter fabric, from just under the adjacent sidewalk to the bottom of the tree pit. Place a 4″ dia. perforated PVC pipe wrapped in filter fabric at the bottom of the gravel and connect it to the storm drain system. This will collect the horizontally moving water and drain it away before it gets to the tree pit.
November 12, 2011 at 11:57 am #159549Ernst GlaeserParticipantUnder Datasheet: D1 Data GB09 Dated 01.01.2010, Terram Salt Barrier
November 12, 2011 at 1:00 pm #159548Andrew Garulay, RLAParticipantThanks.
Will you need to use it underneath as well? Is capillary movement upward in the soil profile going to be a problem?
November 13, 2011 at 5:41 am #159547Ernst GlaeserParticipantPlease see my reply above: November 2, 2011 at 10:39pm
Reg.
Ernst
November 13, 2011 at 5:54 am #159546Ernst GlaeserParticipantGood morning Matthew,
I really like to see how this is executed in the field in an acceptable and feasible and economic way!
The execution of this work method will be a hay day for every site inspector.
Regards
Ernst
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.