Landscape Architecture for Landscape Architects › Forums › GENERAL DISCUSSION › Risk/Reward Contracts
- This topic has 1 reply, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by Chuck B. Edwards.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 21, 2011 at 5:07 pm #158918Terry DeWan, FASLAParticipant
Does anyone have experience in “Risk/Reward Contracts?” A client has asked us to consider entering into such an agreement.
December 21, 2011 at 11:31 pm #158920Chuck B. EdwardsParticipantDo you mean like when a developer ask for a deal on a site master plan, with so called promised “CD work” for the site in the future? If not, please disregard my future ramblings….
In the good old days I would have to say RUN! I found that anytime I was promise something if I gave them a good deal – they would just shop it around to the lowest bidder later.
In today’s economy, work is work, so I would say you would have to make the call.
Merry Christmas and good luck!
December 22, 2011 at 8:01 am #158919ncaParticipantHow is a ‘risk/reward’ contract much different from a ‘hard bid’ or fixed quote contract?
With a quick search I found a discussion on risk/reward contracts based on a software vendors perspective at softwareceo.com. A member posted this reply in response to a similar query:
“Having managed many large scale fixed price software implementation projects, some that included upside reward terms, I can definitely tell you that you are talking about dangerous ground.
Above all, from the beginning, you need to have a good definition of scope agreed to with the client and written into the contract otherwise you’ll liable to be eaten alive. From there, you need a strong project manager that is firm with the client and avoids scope creep during the contract. At the point scope creep begins, the project manager, or you, need to re-negotiate the contractual terms. Scope creep is enemy #1.
Enemy #2 are contractual indemnification clauses — contact terms that force you to pay the client if “things go wrong” (sales are not achieved, cost savings are not achieved, etc.). Be extremely wary of any/all such terms.
Like most business, it comes down to how well do you know what needs to be done and to what extent you can work with the client/customer. Many of these contracts go awry — on the one hand the client wants to share the risk but on the other hand if you are successful and the rewards start flowing the client becomes envious. From a client relationship perspective, these type of contracts are more often than not a disaster.”
Seems like really dangerous territory when working with new clients, but maybe something to consider for established clients with which we already have a solid working relationship.
I knwo thats not an answer, but perhaps this will spark some deeper discussion..
Nick
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.