August 21, 2013 at 11:19 am #154275
This story is all over the place today, entirely without background or explanation:
But I have my doubts. Aside from the structural challenge of hanging a wall of 16 tonnes (35,270 pounds) that will hold 10000 litres of water (22,000 pounds) on the side of an existing building (1912), I wonder at the watering system that will distribute rain water from the roof evenly through the wall (it can’t all come in at the top) and the maintenance of replacing plants and soil over the years on a 21m tall wall. I assume there is a massive rain water storage somewhere, and the wall is irrigated like any other, but what does the living wall add?
Surely there was a better way?August 21, 2013 at 1:58 pm #154290Trace OneParticipant
I saw this, I agree, Rob, it seems a doubtful way to store water or to buffer against storms.. It could be wildlife habitat, rats love this kind of stuff.
But I think the best thing is reduction in the human population. Lester Brown of the Worldwatch Institute thinks human population crash is inevitable, from zoonotic diseases or drought – he points out that water is already being imported in vast quantities to China and the Middle East in the form of grain.
Cheerful thought for the day!August 21, 2013 at 2:05 pm #154289
Sheesh, Trace, I was just thinking about urban water run off!August 21, 2013 at 2:31 pm #154288
When are they going to propose giant sponges everywhere?August 21, 2013 at 2:41 pm #154287Tosh KParticipant
I recall a competition entry using a highly absorbent fabric buoy/levy system… seemed a bit hokey, but maybe not?August 21, 2013 at 2:54 pm #154286Trace OneParticipant
sorry, I’m a big picture kind of gal..
: )August 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm #154285
I guess my objection to what I am seeing here is that, if I am correct that they must be caching the rain water, that they build this huge structure that requires huge maintenance, and say it has to do with sustainability. If one is going to start with the large cistern, then wouldn’t the project be more sustainable if the water were used for existing needs: toilets? nearby parkland? washing the Queen’s corgis?August 21, 2013 at 3:50 pm #154284
Agreed about the building. And old masonry core building supporting an extra 27 tons (24 metric tonnes) of weight on one wall, which looks to have been a shared wall at one point, doesn’t seem all that safe. One major question of these systems is long term mold ramifications. Having been dealing with a mold problem myself, the lack of air circulation behind the system on a masonry wall, along with the added dense shade and adjacent humidity from the plants and water seem like a recipe for a problem. I could see if this were a modern building with a rain screen system, and it does look as if they put some sort of membrane on the wall, but if it isn’t a proper vapor barrier, you will have moisture behind it, so you will have mold.August 21, 2013 at 5:26 pm #154283Goustan BODINParticipant
“experts say will prevent central London from flooding”
As long as London is flood saved, the answer is clearly YES, living walls can save us. Listen to experts.August 21, 2013 at 5:39 pm #154282
The same may be said about the green wall. I’d go with hokey. …. nothing against green walls, just the incredible amount of unrealistic earth saving attributes that go with their promoters.August 21, 2013 at 5:45 pm #154281
How long before medical marijuana and green walls are combined with a few tomatoes and we can finally get rid of engineers, drug companies, Super Walmarts, and Monsanto?
It is going to be interesting to see how history views some of these things in a few years.August 21, 2013 at 5:49 pm #154280
You would not want to consume anything grown on a roof or wall in a city. Who knows what is shoved into the fruits from what the plant pulls out of the air?August 21, 2013 at 7:48 pm #154279
If my sarcasm is not coming through, I find the whole green roof/wall thing making a huge impact on the environment to be just as ridiculous as marijuana being a universal cure all (not saying it does not help a few things, just not all the things people are pretending it helps).August 21, 2013 at 9:13 pm #154278
Sometimes it is hard to tell with the typing and all. I personally know people who pretty much think exactly the way you had typed. Plus a good portion of the State of Colorado.August 22, 2013 at 2:31 am #154277
… and Washington State.
I did my share to incinerate what I could some time ago and have a very hard time remembering believing that it is a cure all. It might, however, give rise to the notion that green walls will cure flooding and stop global warming …. “and it will cure your asthma, too”.
Poncho by Sears (someone will know the reference)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.