Landscape Architecture for Landscape Architects › Forums › GENERAL DISCUSSION › Help! Looking for theoretical info about using a “Big Idea” to start the design process and LA’s that use it.
- This topic has 1 reply, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
ernie garcia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 19, 2011 at 8:10 am #160415
ernie garciaParticipantThere is a book called “From Concept to Form in Landscape Design” by Grant W. Reid that may help a bit. The first 10 pages or so discuss methods of the design process and essentially how a concept is evolved into something that you can take to design documents. The rest of the book discusses pretty basic stuff like formal geometric versus naturalistic design styles as well as case studies. See if anyone has a copy you can borrow.
September 19, 2011 at 11:14 am #160414
Andrew Garulay, RLAParticipantI don’t know that you can search by a general subject, but think of all of the projects that are dominated by one aspect and they are endless.
9-11 memorials – any of them, any memorial at all, historic restorations, any type of restoration project (including wetland or habitat), any theme based design (what about that MAC/Apple project that was recently discussed – it had a theme that was separate from the building which might make it all that more a good isolation of the “big idea”?).
September 19, 2011 at 6:06 pm #160413
Leslie B WagleParticipantThis comes to mind and maybe you can research it further. Also I think there is a butterfly one somewhere.
http://www.harbourfrontcentre.com/thewaterfront/parks/musicgarden.cfm
September 19, 2011 at 10:01 pm #160412
Tosh KParticipantMaybe go through design competition entries (highline, freshkills -see praxis issue- and downsview -see monograph- have been critically reviewed so you may find it easier to go through those)- often the design concept revolves around a central idea that’s obvious in their brief. I’m not sure what you mean by “big ideas,” but common conceptual beginnings in comp entries include: shift, blur, stitch, emergence, succession, erosion, accretion, adaptability, resilience, synergy; well, you get the idea.
I’ve known a few designers that break down a particular piece of art and use the concepts present in the art to a landscape – it seems odd at first but works well if done with care (artists included Stella, Picasso, Mangold, LeWitt, etc).
Process driven design? Conceptual design? Different ways of putting it implies a different emphasis.
good luck
September 20, 2011 at 4:16 am #160411bak
ParticipantA thesis done by a student at Virginia Polytechnic Institute might have some valuable insights, or at the very least a bibliography worth raiding: A Study of Landscape Architecture Design Methods by Christopher James Lidy
September 21, 2011 at 12:52 am #160410
GraceWarneParticipantThanks everybody so far! Very helpful.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
