What is your first impression of this bench?

Landscape Architecture for Landscape Architects Forums DETAILS & MATERIALS What is your first impression of this bench?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #166371
    Andrew Spiering
    Participant

    This is the Civil Bench by Forms+Surfaces.  What’s your first impression?

     

    #166411
    Mandy
    Participant

    I think…how will this meet ADA in SF.

    #166410
    Thomas J. Johnson
    Participant

    contrived. forced. disconnect between materials. If you’re going to have a back rest, have a back rest. People naturally dictate their “personal space without having dividers. Without knowing the context of the bench, I don’t understand the need to have alternating seating orientations. feels awkward.

    not to be a total downer, it does look difficult to skate (skateboard), except for the bars on the end, those would be perfect for rail slides…

    #166409
    Rob Halpern
    Participant

    First impression:

     

    ow!

    #166408
    Andrew Garulay, RLA
    Participant

    It will be great once they get all the flower pots on it and put some seating around it.

    #166407
    Andrew Spiering
    Participant

    Funny.  I thought the same thing about the rail slide.

    #166406
    Boilerplater
    Participant

    It was designed to keep homeless people from snoozing.

    #166405
    Andrew Garulay, RLA
    Participant

    I think it was designed to make homeless people go home!

    #166404
    Boilerplater
    Participant

    Home to where?

    #166403
    Jason T. Radice
    Participant

     

    I’d have to see the scale of it, but it looks extraordinarily uncomfortable, and the bars on the back are just at the right height to create pain in the lower back trying to avoid them to get maximum ass-to-seat contact on what looks to be a very narrow bench. I looked at the specs online, and the total depth is 16, not the seat, but from outside of the frame to ourside of the frame. So the seat is 12″? Geez. If you want to go double sided, use a double-wide backless bench! And those seat edges look wicked sharp to me.

    #166402
    Dennis Wade Corry
    Participant

    It is purposely designed to be uncomfortable so its function is for short usage periods. The tubular steel rails seperate users. All those perforations imply a need for a quick draining surface. The design is very “institutional”. The obvious principal use seems as a shower seat for geratric inmates in a prison. 

    #166401
    Zach Watson
    Participant

    First thought – Uncomfortable

     

    Second thought – why not give people the ability to sit how and where they want, we should not force people to sit specific ways because of the design.

    #166400
    Thomas J. Johnson
    Participant

    Making it “work” could be as simple as using stainless for the seat and rolling the edge of the seat to match the radius of the tubing. Another option would be using 1″ boxed tubing, stacked two together, fabricated at 90* angles instead of bends to match the aesthetic of the existing seat. You could also create short backs for each section, stacking lengths of the same tubing 7 high.

    If it’s used in L.A. or Phoenix stainless will cook people. The seat looks hot too… Powder coating it in two shades of desert camo would be cooler (temperature wise) and would look groovy too, like, light gray for the seat and medium tan for the rail…

    #166399
    Jason T. Radice
    Participant

    Oh, by the way, that is actually THREE benches put end to end.

    #166398
    Trace One
    Participant

    Help, I got caught between bars and seat in freak accident while reaching for a hanky- chest being compressed – call out the Fire Department, bring a blow – torch!

     

     

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Lost Password

Register