Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2015 at 11:09 pm #151890Jacob CollinsParticipant
Thank you Tosh. It’s funny. I have seen details like the one you describe and remember thinking, ‘how the heck are we supposed to pull that off.’ I appreciate what you say about a “trades point-of-view”. Sometimes, Architects and Engineers are not fluent in tradesman-speak which can be frustrating at times. Since I will have a foot in the past and future of each, I can find my ‘foot-in-the-door’ niche and serve as an interpreter while performing my actual duties as a LA. Just a thought.
June 30, 2015 at 10:59 pm #151891Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you Craig. I have been concerned about the “old dog, no new tricks” mentality I may find in a new field from new employers, I hope the act of returning to school at a later stage in life will not only show that this old-youngish dog (I’m only 36) is eager to learn new tricks, but has the experience in life, you pointed out, that separates me from the rest of the pack.
June 30, 2015 at 12:09 am #151894Jacob CollinsParticipantI was just re-reading your post. I was concerned the that my previous career wouldn’t transfer to LA but understand now that the maturity I’ve gained through the years, not only in my personal life but in the workforce, is just as important. Thank you Mark.
June 30, 2015 at 12:03 am #151895Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you Ida. Knowing there isn’t just one type of office gives me hope that I will find my fit in the industry. I need to research more on the different avenues of employment available.
June 30, 2015 at 12:00 am #151896Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you Cheryl. I know my previous experiences will seperate myself from graduates. I have to remember to allow the employers to see this as a positive. All your suggested questions will give me something to consider.
June 29, 2015 at 11:55 pm #151897Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you Andrew. What you say of maturity makes sense. Also your thoughts on mitigating any aprehensions on the part of the employer , and displaying a calm persona are helpful thoughts.
June 27, 2015 at 2:46 am #151901Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you Mark. Your insight is greatly appreciated.
November 22, 2013 at 6:25 pm #153604Jacob CollinsParticipantThanks Jordan. Great insight. I talked to my instructor about who has gone on to get licensed and was told no one that she knows of. The Associates is geared towards those who have the work experience without the education to obtain licensure. I guess a top down, reverse approach to becoming licensed. Thank you for answering my question everyone. I appreciate it very much. I can now say that Cal Poly Pomona is in my future and the Associates degree is no longer being considered.
November 19, 2013 at 5:02 pm #153606Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you for the links Andrew. Much appreciated. The info in the California requirements is great.
November 19, 2013 at 4:58 pm #153607Jacob CollinsParticipantThat’s a good point Leslie about checking on past grads of the program. I’m changing careers at 35 and had reservations about a 4-year college. I would be hitting the bottom of the ladder at 40 and licensed at 41 or 42. I guess the Associates seemed like the easy road to get back to an income. I need to research a little more.
November 19, 2013 at 4:54 pm #153608Jacob CollinsParticipantThank you Ida. I have noticed this also.
-
AuthorPosts