It’s a nice sentiment expressed here, but I think the reality is quite different, especially in these hard economic times. Although I agree that it is a good idea to redevelop existing historic centers and take advantage of existing infrastructure, a combination of existing conditions and government regulations make this not feasible economically. There are several examples of this… Historic preservation laws make it difficult or impossible to demolish historic structures that are not financially feasible to bring up to today’s building and accessibility codes. Either the codes or the preservation laws need to be relaxed, otherwise developers are in a straitjacket. Environmental laws make it difficult to redevelop brownfield sites without expensive studies and cleanup efforts. And, here in Cincinnati and other cities with older combined sewer systems, EPA consent decrees essentially prohibit additional development in areas that are tributary to combined sewer overflows — which is a good thing for water quality, but a bad thing for the redevelopment of the center city. Zoning laws make it hard to repurpose old structures for new uses.
Essentially, I think your comment proposes a nice idea, but to make it work in reality, a lot of work and some tough decisions will be required. As planners, we need to educate our government leaders about the land use impacts of their decisions.
