Richard Balkins – Astoria Building Design, LLC

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3562406

    “WHY…is it so very obvious, that “ASLA” is….politically LIBERAL??? IMO, Landscape Architecture has not business being involved in the AMERICAN Political System…..Landscape Architecture should NOT be LEFT or RIGHT.

    And, WHY do I also believe a vast MAJORITY of University Landscape Architecture Professors are also VERY LIBERAL! That they have “liberal agendas”, so that’s how many of their Graduating Students lean when they graduate….to the LEFT.

    America is too divided enough as it is…..NOW, I see that Landscape Architecture has become DIVIDED politically. Just no excuse for it, IMO,

    J. Robert (Bob) Wainner”

    You propose that professionals should not have any involvement in politics. That’s exactly what the professions did in the “Progressive” movement in the late 1800s and first half of the 1900s was doing…. getting into politics and to establish licensure. There’s no separation between professions and politics or life, values, beliefs, and politics. This country was never truly UNITED. Europeans stole an entire continent engaging in biological warfare and in genocide to take this continent from those who were already here. The same very Europeans infestation that imported slaves from another continent.

    Without political involvement, we would still have slaves and discrimination. We also would be using coal and oil for everything. We wouldn’t have the EPA, building codes, or any of that. Advocacy has been a part of professional associations since their conception. Yes, there was a time period were professions wanted to be apolitical. Apolitical is apathy and apathy is passively condoning the wrongs in the world instead of making the world a better place. Isn’t making the world a better place the mission and point of architecture and landscape architecture? Isn’t that what you are trying to do in your practice including by the client. Each client, an opportunity to make the world better one little project at a time.

    In my opinion, there is no “Right”. There is the political “Left” and the political “wrong” (IMO). The Left isn’t always right. The other side is inherently and totally wrong these days because they rejected morality, responsibility, and any sense of giving two seconds of ones own life to care for others. They are Trumps and followers of that racist KKK ‘member’ who is also anti-“non-white” and supports and authorized and ordered the U.S. Border Patrol to engage in criminal kidnapping. These are the kinds of people who wants to reverse civil rights, re-institute slavery, women no longer having any liberties to work, and being gainfully employed and subordinate to men and non-whites have no rights.

    If you know the history of the United States, it isn’t the b.s. you grew up learning in school because it was politically “WHITE-washed” and written in the perspective approved by rich white men who financed the criminal takeover of this continent and genocide of the various indigenous people of this continent along with also in South America where Europeans were likewise the same. Manifest Destiny was the inspiration and precedence for Mein Kampf. In World War II, the vast majority of every able man and even women took part in stopping the global takeover of Hitler’s plan for taking over the world for world domination of white supremacy, genocide, slavery/concentration camps, and so forth.

    U.S. expansion was founded on atrocity. If you live west of the Atlantic seashore, a good chance is you are living on land that is the rightful property of native Americans that were here thousands of years before we came here. If we were to do what was morally right, this land would be given back to the native American and we go back to the lands of our ancestral history but that’s now complicated and is now unrealistic of happening.

    The truth is we are divided and always have been. We have been only to some degree politically united but that’s not to say we are homogenous. There are people who will not want to be culturally neutered through culturally oppressive cultural assimilation processes like that which is the norm of American “unification” meaning…. all must become “white”. Talk like “white”. Believe like “white”. Dress like “white”. Work like “white”. It’s a complicated story.

    I think as a profession advocating environmentally sound, and sustainable architecture & landscape, is something as a profession we should be advocating for and backing in politics relating to policies that impacts the environment and the world. We have a professional obligation to take every reasonable effort to make the world better. Much like doctors oath of not doing harm. We have a sort of similar obligation. I’m a building designer/landscape designer. Well, I kind of do building design, interior design, landscape design as part of a holistic design process.

    #3562405

    I agree with the landscape architects on this forum making the point that you need to abide by the laws. In your country, state, province, territory, or other subpolitical body within that country, if the title “Landscape Architect” and/or the “practice of landscape architect” is regulated in a manner that requires licensure to use the title or practice landscape architecture (as in offering and performing landscape design work that REQUIRES a license. Work that does not require a license is called ‘landscape design’. You may refer to the the academic and art of landscape design as landscape architect when you are not doing so in the context of procuring projects with prospective client, marketing your business, doing such work for clients, etc. It’s like I am not a licensed Architect and must use the title ‘building designer’ instead and refer to such services as “building design” services. Of course, there are places in the world that is not regulated so I can refer to such services as architectural services in connection with projects in those locations but not for projects in my state. The same principle also applies with the realm of landscape architecture & landscape design. The point is about not representing yourself as someone who is licensed. NOTE: In the U.S., the term “license” or “licensed”, or “licensure” and sometimes the use of the term “Registered”, when it comes to occupational licensure/registration, is issued by a governmental agency or department otherwise they are called ‘certifications’ which is usually issued by a professional association / certification organization. Both are valid credentials that you can use to market yourself as someone who has been professionally assessed by third-parties…. and that it is not just your word.

    It is important that we respect the licensure process as we also would respect professional certification and their respective credential/titles. If you want to use the Landscape Architect title and practice landscape architecture then get do the work to the get the license. If you want to do work of similar nature but not go through the work of getting licensed, there are good professional alternatives that you can make a good living and be a respected profession even among your professional colleagues that are licensed such as landscape design and use the landscape designer title. There is even a professional association and certification for landscape designers from the APLD. I’m currently working on the building designer certification from AIBD. I am also looking to possibly getting the APLD certification.

    I’ve read several of the comments from Landscape Architects and their beef with people who are not licensed using the title. While I agree with their ‘beef’, I don’t necessarily agree with the tone that some of them have used. However, their point should not be disregarded. I’ve seen this kind of stuff before in regular ol’ Architecture forums with licensed Architects griping about unlicensed persons calling themselves architects and even engaging in work that requires a license while not under the direct supervision & control of a licensed/registered Architect.

    #3562403

    In Oregon, any project that exceeds $2000 requires a contract.

    I’m assuming you meant “written contracts”. That applies to those licensed as a landscape contractor much like the CCB requirements for written contracts over a certain dollar amount. This does not apply to “landscape designers” because there are no licensure requirements and laws & rules that apply explicitly to licensed occupations do not apply explicitly to non-licensed occupations. Having said that, in the litigated nature in the AEC industry, I would recommend using a written contract signed by all parties to the contract regardless of the contract value. Unrecorded verbal agreements are useless. You want some record and a written contract is the best way to go.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

Lost Password

Register