Where are Obama’s Green Jobs?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 119 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #162016
    Heather Smith
    Participant

    I wasn’t saying government doesn’t create jobs…but it does not create near enough jobs for everyone that needs one. My point was that we aren’t sitting around for a job. And I don’t blame a politician because I don’t have one.

    #162015
    Alan Ray, RLA
    Participant

    How many govt. jobs actuall pay their own way? I can’t think of any…..

    Post Office?…losing billions a year while ups and fedex make billions….

    Amtrack?…also losing billions…why is govt. in rail? why not air and sea travel? just imagine how much more we could throw away on more bloated inefficiency….

    where does it end? I guess when the Chinese finally quit lending us money to spend on losing programs…

    #162014
    Heather Smith
    Participant

    Define make their own way? I don’t mean ones that are run inefficiently…but just at a local level we pay taxes to have services performed. Our region has been fiscally responsible…saving away for times such as these…so far our parks are still maintained and roads still plowed in the winter. No police have been laid off nor have any teachers. These services are necessary for the greater good not for profit…but just because we aren’t making a profit doesn’t mean we are running a deficit either. I am probably not making any sense…I think I am just saying I don’t think making a profit is always the best way to handle the running of our cities either. I think one reason health care costs are crrraazzzy is because corporations are driven by profit…could they charge less and still make a profit…sure…but they are charged with the responsibility of making their shareholders as much as possible…forcing us all to pay astronomical fees for modest benefit.

    So yeah I am curious…do you mean my City Supervisor should not be paid by taxes? That a private company should be in charge of running my city? Because one way or another they have to be paid.

    #162013
    Trace One
    Participant

    but the concept is incorrect. Producing goods needs roads – it needs safety,order and stability. You cannot take that out of the economic equation.. Amtrak may  not make a profit, but wht is the price of the social benefit of having a society that is mobile, that is connected – and Amtraks profitability has a lot to do with the private use of publicly built rails..

    I like that interpretation, that makes sense to me, Heather – when people say government doesn’t make jobs they mean don’t wait for the paycheck, go out and sell ice cream from a truck if you have to (I have had to..actually a pretty fun job..).

    Government is government, the goods it produces could be called ‘goods’ in that they are more focused on altruism helping others and community..These are essential goods for the society..Mcdonalds produces burgers, a good only in the sense that it is built, since it is neither tasty nor ‘good’ or acting for the good…Goods are goods…it is one world, we are all part of a fabric, as much as we would like to only focus on what we see..

    thank you tho, I did learn something from this thread..

    #162012
    Leslie B Wagle
    Participant

    I don’t think anyone opposes some level of government – ie. that it can be more efficient to have the peace of mind to be able to eat in restaurants and know that a sanitary inspector has given them a posted “score,” rather than have to try by guinea pig experiments and passing word of mouth on the nasty ones (trial and error method). So, that adds a kind of benefit to business. But there is also the argument that under excessive taxation taken from both the business and the people who would like to be diners, there are fewer tables set and therefore less need for cooks and waitresses, etc. So the whole argument swirls around HOW MUCH; that is, the whens, wheres, etc. of regulation.

     

    If government (and I was part of a local level one) is perceived as top heavy and inefficient, then as the saying goes “inquiring minds want to know,” and they should have a right to. In my experience, human nature tends to excessive self-protection (greed in eyes of others) no matter which (private or public) sector it operates. Eventually it gets trimmed either by competitive market realities or rough politics, since unfortunately certain cubicles can’t be counted to stay on a moderate course. For example, our local school system was found to have over 100 hidden people making over 100k salaries as “experts” and “advisors” and so forth who weren’t even there a few years ago and do nothing detectable in the classroom environment. This is in a region where thousands of ex-mill workers, ex call center employees, and ex construction and others can’t find work at all. I’m sure the central school office folks all feel “necessary” but I’m not so sure going by letters to the editor, that either the taxpayers or the teachers are convinced. It’s good to have flashlights shining on that kind of situation as well as on fat cats in private corporations. 

    #162011
    Trace One
    Participant

    yes, it is fairly complex to determine appropriate levels..and then if one gets the feeling of collusion between government and private, like how Goldman Sachs et al have infiltrated government and skewed policies in their favor, so that our tax dollars are going into Lloyd Blankfeins pocket – or in the case of Dick Cheney, our tax dollars are going to support Halliburton, which in turn uses illegal workers at the bottom of the feeding chain who are  housed in barracks and treated like slaves, so our tax dollars are used to enslave  people..

    ok, this is making this irrigation plan suddenly look easy to figure out..

    ..
    Sunlight is the best medicine as they say..

     

     

    #162010
    Jon Quackenbush
    Participant

    I’d rather get an ibex, they are more entertaining.

    #162009
    Jon Quackenbush
    Participant

    sigh…

    if they bailed me out of my student loan (which is small potatoes comapred to the bank bailout) I would have a lot more disposable income, and I could then afford to buy/build a house and pay for a car and so on… that would help the economy too!  heck, i’d settle for a 0% interest rate too, or make student loan payments tax deductable (not just the interest paid)…

    so much we could do instead of give money away to already rich jerks.

    #162008
    Alan Ray, RLA
    Participant

    …and the govt. subsidises farmers which exploit illeagle workers…so, on it goes….

    I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHERE ARE THE GREEN JOBS ??????????????

    #162007
    Christopher Patzke
    Participant

    They are visiting the unicorn exhibit at the petting zoo.

    #162006
    Mike G
    Participant

    TARP = bank bailout, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act = stimulus.

    #162005
    Heather Smith
    Participant

    haha

    #162004
    Heather Smith
    Participant

    Green jobs will be created when the market determines they can save more money or make more money. If we mean green jobs as in landscape architecture…well I don’t think we are going to see that. If you mean green jobs as in biotech/smart grid, etc….those will be created as quickly as the market dictates.

    When I see a question like this I believe you are saying something more then you are asking. You are angry that Obama hasn’t given you a pony…okay. Say so. Honestly, I don’t even think some landscape architects perform green work…we do residential design/build…is that a “green job”…I don’t think so.

    I don’t feel strongly about this either way…because I think a lot of the sustainability/green job talk is made for political points. Ultimately, we can see how invested we as a society are based on our use of fuels and the extraction of them. Within my own community people are protesting the Mega Loads(google Idaho Megaloads if you haven’t heard of them) because of the tar sands. Ironically, most of them drove their SUVs 30 miles to go protest them. I am tired of hearing people complain about things and just complaining. That is why I say…if you want more green jobs…create them. The market dictates the use of fuel…therefore the tar sands are profitable. We are a capitalistic society, we can debate how ethical that is…but it is what it is. I can’t afford a hybrid vehicle…and unfortunately neither can most Americans.

    #162003
    Trace One
    Participant

    actually the tar sands extraction is heavily subsized by the government, unfortunately. There are direct tax subsidies, as well as road use, environmental pollution that does not figure into any calculations of cost (tar sand extraction is extremely pollution process of both the air and water..), and the intense use of water that the process requires..

    The free market does not exist, except for green initiatives, which cannot seem to get the same subsidies as good old oil

    People often do not realize how much the government influences the market…The government really drives the private sector..in some ways..

     

     – 

    #162002
    Heather Smith
    Participant

    I understand this. But driving an SUV to protest the Tar Sands…is….

     

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 119 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Lost Password

Register